Subscribe to Newsletter
Google
  

Articles
Beware of the H-4
The Great Indian Talent Hunt
Yahoo!’s Got Peanut Butter All Over
CLINTON GLOBAL INITIATIVE
Google + YouTube = GooTube?
Companies That Can Change The World
Web 2.0
The Asian Work Challenge
First time flyers
If Compliance be the food of corporate security: Munch on
Reverse Migration
Shades of Ancient Rome in Call Centres
Mobile Business Studio
Jobs with Bonds - Not the best Bond
Business Process Management (BPM) technology
India beckon Returnees
VoIP
Unbound Compute for Enterprise Java
Indian job market
Phishing - Online fraud
Artificial Hygiene
Radio frequency identification (RFID)
Gartner's 2005 predictions for Asia-Pacific
Mobile gaming Boom
Wireless local area network
Internet security and Hacking
Optical networking
Outsourcing: A global Phenomenon
Emerging Grid computing
Using Linux in Embedded Systems
Windows XP Service Pack 2
IT outsourcing results in net US job growth
Encore for i-flex solutions
Aviva makes IT investment in efficiency
RIL announced unaudited results for the nine months
Riverstone Networks to deliver advanced Ethernet business services
Hughes Software Systems showcases Triple Play Capability
SAP Advances CRM Market Share in Asia-Pacific
AMD's new bag of chips
SARS gives India IT a cold
Intel moves inside out with Centrino
It's got under my skin
IT czars say business as usual
DNA Outside the Gene
BOT deals on the rise in outsourcing market
Ahoy, Space Ahead!
A Tale of Two Protocols
NAScent Leader: Storage Networking
Is Small the next Big Thing
Zero tolerance for downtime
VC Tree is still Green
Innovation @ the speed of thought
Silicon Valley's jobless rate 7.9 per cent
Beefing up Product Development
Unwiring the Enterprise: Wireless Lans
How is India Inc Surviving?
Bullish run for India chip industry
Next networking evolution
Indian handhelds come of age with Kaii
Digital Dividend for farmers
No full stops in IT
Flexed muscles do not mean war
Where is the job market heading?
Offshore projects help companies buck downtrend
Annual performance review
Fingertip Computing: Smart world of web services
Diary of a Start-Up
Sinha fails to walk the talk
Return of the Native
How VCs suck life out of a company
High volumes, low margins is IT's new reality
Performance on par: Infosys Q3 results
2001: Bitter-sweet pill
Markets, family decline Fiorina's offer
Growing power of back office boys
Vision Software
Professional clubs anchor techies
Honesty is the best downturn cure
Other India and The Road Ahead
Braving the Taliban's guns
India Inc. heaves at US' Onward India mantra

Broken promises: H-1B work contracts

Bye Uncle Sam, Europe's
here
H-1B workers feel pinch of US downturn
Pink slips make H-1B workers see red
Complete text of Budget 2001
Why Indian techies can laugh away slowdown fears?
Give your career a start-up boost
Stop b******* about the US Consulate
Why IT pros prefer US to Europe?
Home

Flexed muscles do not mean war

he phrase eye-ball to eye-ball confrontation bandied in liberal measure to describe the longest and biggest military build-up against Pakistan on the Line of Control has made India IT Incorporated blink. In the last few days, business newspapers have been dominated by stories on the impact of the government's tough military posture on India's blue-eyed IT sector. From stories which stuck reassuring notes with 'business as usual' to the alarming with Nasscom predicting a dent in India's software exports if war breaks out, India's IT sector is now confused and worried. The reasons are not far to seek. War is inimical to good economics and India's high-pitched rhetoric has undeniably stuck a discordant note in the sector's growth plans. Twelve board members of a leading networking MNC, for instance, have cancelled their visit to the company's India development centre consequent to the travel advisory issued by the US government instructing citizens not to travel to India. Other MNCs operating out of India have been instructed to take adequate back-ups by the parent company in case of war. Software service companies such as Wipro have warned of longer decision cycles by US customers; and fears of India losing out entirely on offshore projects are on the upswing.

After warding the 9/11 attacks that threatened to freeze growth, the rising tension in India's software sector as the government ups the ante on the LOC is natural and understandable, but should not be used as a weapon to pressurise the government to deescalate tension. It is nobody's argument that India should declare an expensive and wasteful war on Pakistan and hurt its economy. In fact, this site has constantly argued for peace and dialogue in the face of high tempers. Indian industry needs to support the massing of troops and the current military build-up against Pakistan as the pre-war combative measures are one of the few viable options against the open export and endorsement of terror in Kashmir by Pakistan. This year alone, India's Border Security Forces assert, 402 armed militants have entered the Kashmir Valley. The largest number - 163 - crossed in May. Indian government' patience has been tried, tested and exhausted but the government cannot and will not go forward and declare war because: a) it knows that a war against terrorism cannot be fought through conventional means; two, although General Musharraf is playing a dangerous dual game, nobody want an unstable nuclear Pakistan with Afghan jehadis running amok. Against this backdrop, India has no choice but to line its border with troops and flex its military muscle to bring sustained international pressure on General Musharaff to rein the mind-numbing violence inflicted by terrorists in the Valley. As an editor of an Asian daily remarked; "Its only when India scares the pants-off the world that it wakes up to Kashmir."

The US media has raised fears of a possible nuclear Armageddon, forgetting India's commitment to no first use. Consider this 4 June report in USA Today: "The problem is once the iron starts to be exchanged between the two sides, then reason and logic seem to go out the window ....The US government fears that citizens of both countries, which first tested nuclear weapons in 1998, don't grphp the repercussions of a decision to go nuclear. In the West, schoolchildren learn about the devastating effects of the US atomic bombs dropped on Japan in 1945. But that's not the case in South Asia, There's never been a major movie about what would happen in a nuclear war. Even educated people often think about this in the abstract." The reports paint India as an irrational, immature third world nation unaware of the destructive potential of its nuclear arsenal. Driving these reports in the Western media is the fear that a redeployment of forces on Pakistan's Western front will jeopardise the hunt to dislodge terrorists entrenched firmly in Pakistan's Eastern territory. In a well-targeted practice of psychological warfare, Pakistan capitalised on world fears, raised the sceptre of a nuclear war in the UN and soon after test fired its nuclear-capable missiles, including one that can reach most of India's large cities.

Indian business may be hurt to some extent but war is less closer than it appears. The current leash straining is not a prelude to war but an essential measure to bring international pressure on Pakistan stop subversion from across the border; the first step to restore normalcy in violence inflicted Kashmir. Industry bodies like Nasscom need to take this story of the current build-up to the outside world rather than get upset by psychological propaganda which speaks of nuclear war and describe the region as the most dangerous place on earth.

 

Email this article | Respond to this article

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------